🧪 Exciting News! We’ve launched our New Lab Program - empowering innovation with cutting-edge research facilities. <a href="https://cellculturecollective.com/new-lab-program/" target="_blank">Explore Now! 🔬</a>
🧪 Exciting News! We’ve launched our New Lab Program - empowering innovation with cutting-edge research facilities. <a href="https://cellculturecollective.com/new-lab-program/" target="_blank">Explore Now! 🔬</a>
$342.00
Synthetic photo-crosslinkable PEGDA hydrogel in three molecular weights, for bioprinting, defined 3D matrices, and composite hydrogel systems.
PEGDA is based on polyethylene glycol modified with acrylate groups, allowing fast and controlled light-based crosslinking. Smart MCs offers PEGDA in three molecular weights (PEGDA-400, PEGDA-600, PEGDA-1000), giving flexibility to tune mechanical properties and hydrogel structure.
PEGDA is often used as a biologically inert, highly controllable baseline, ideal for studying cell behavior without interference from the material itself. Because it does not naturally support cell attachment, it’s commonly modified with peptides or other biomolecules depending on the application. PEGDA-400 forms tighter, stiffer hydrogels with smaller mesh size; PEGDA-600 is a balanced, moderate option; PEGDA-1000 produces softer, more permeable hydrogels.
At room temperature, PEGDA may be liquid or semi-solid depending on molecular weight; higher molecular weight variants may need gentle warming before use.
KEY FEATURES
APPLICATIONS
SPECIFICATIONS
| Material | PEG diacrylate (PEGDA) |
| Variants | PEGDA-400 (~400 Da), PEGDA-600 (~600 Da), PEGDA-1000 (800–1000 Da) |
| Appearance | 400: liquid at 25°C/4°C. 600: liquid at 25°C, semi-solid at 4°C. 1000: semi-solid at both. |
| Package includes | 10 g PEGDA + 0.5 g LAP photoinitiator per unit |
| Crosslinking | UV or visible light (~405 nm) + LAP; TPO-L compatible alternative |
| Digestibility | Enzymatically degradable, formulation-dependent |
| Grade | Research use only |
| Storage | RT up to 3 months, 4°C up to 12 months, ‒20°C up to 18 months, protected from light |
She never once looked through a telescope. Yet Henrietta Leavitt figured out how to measure the size of the universe. In the early 1900s, Henriette Leavitt sat for hours in a small room at Harvard, studying photographs of the night sky, one of many women hired to do the observatory’s
Mary Anning is one of the most consequential figures in the history of natural science and one of the least credited. Born in 1799 in the coastal town of Lyme Regis, England, she spent her life excavating fossils from the cliffs along the Jurassic Coast, making discoveries that fundamentally altered
For most of human history, the question of why a child is born male or female was answered with guesswork. Aristotle blamed the temperature of the womb. Others pointed to diet, position, or the mother’s health. By the late 1800s, science had not done much better. Then an intelligent, methodical
For decades, physicists believed that the laws of nature treated left and right exactly the same. This assumption, known as parity conservation, was considered so fundamental that few scientists thought to question it. By the middle of the twentieth century, it had become one of the certainties of modern physics.
In the late nineteenth century, chemistry was transforming laboratories, but its reach had barely touched the environments people lived in. Cities were growing quickly, water supplies were inconsistent, and sanitation systems were still developing. The scientific tools to measure these conditions existed, yet few researchers had begun applying them to
In the middle of the twentieth century, scientific laboratories in the United States were not neutral spaces and access was very limited. For a Black woman, the path into advanced scientific research was neither open nor encouraged. Overcoming the dual hurdles of racial and gender bias, Marie Maynard Daly entered
Long before the double helix became a symbol of modern biology, its shape remained an enigma. Scientists suspected DNA held the key to life’s code, but its structure was still out of reach. In a lab at King’s College London, Rosalind Franklin began a line of experiments that would change
Every lab experiment carries more than just scientific weight. It carries the pressure of deadlines, grant expectations, publication goals, and the simple but critical need for results that can be trusted. Yet all too often, experiments are compromised not because of a flawed hypothesis, but because of something much smaller;
Behind every successful experiment is a series of small, consistent choices and often, the most overlooked are the tools we use every day. In cell culture, even the best protocols and techniques can’t compensate for consumables that fall short on sterility, reliability, or performance. Contamination, variability, and unexpected failures rarely
